Professional Services 85 employees DISC Workshop + Team Coaching

A growing professional services firm had a strong leadership team on paper — experienced, credentialed, individually successful. But the executive meetings told a different story. Decisions stalled. Two senior leaders had stopped collaborating entirely, routing everything through the CEO. Departments operated in silos, and mid-level managers were caught in the middle, unsure whose direction to follow.

The CEO described it simply: “I have good people who can’t work together.”

The friction wasn’t about competence or even disagreement on goals. It was behavioral. One leader was direct, fast-moving, and results-focused — interpreting her colleague’s methodical, data-driven approach as obstruction. He, in turn, read her decisiveness as recklessness. Neither was wrong. They were operating from fundamentally different behavioral styles with no shared language to bridge the gap.

We began with individual DISC assessments for the entire leadership team — a 10-minute investment per person that produced detailed coaching reports with each leader’s behavioral profile. In a facilitated half-day workshop, the team mapped their collective behavioral composition and, for the first time, saw the pattern clearly.

The two leaders in conflict were a textbook D–C dynamic: one driven by Results and Control, the other by Data and Precision. Once they had language for the difference — and understood that neither style was superior — the conversation shifted from “why won’t you listen?” to “how do we leverage both perspectives?”

We followed the workshop with three months of team coaching sessions, focusing on practical communication adaptations: how to present ideas to different styles, how to run meetings that honor both pace and thoroughness, and how to give feedback in a way each style can actually hear.

Within six months, the CEO reported that executive meetings had gone from 90 minutes of circular debate to focused 45-minute sessions with clear decisions. The two leaders developed a working rhythm — she brought the initial direction, he stress-tested it — that the rest of the team began to model. Cross-departmental collaboration improved measurably, and two mid-level managers who had been considering leaving chose to stay.

The Takeaway: Most team dysfunction isn’t about skill or intent — it’s about behavioral style. DISC gives teams a neutral, practical language for differences that would otherwise become personal. The assessment takes minutes; the shared understanding lasts years.

Does This Sound Familiar?

Every engagement starts with a conversation. Tell us what you’re facing.

Start a Conversation →