Fair Does Not Mean Equal
The Situation
They had three grown children. Alex was actively involved in the business. Barb had recently returned after running her own venture. Charlie had no involvement and worked in an entirely different industry. Sharon and Tom also held significant personal real estate — commercial properties leased to the business, a primary residence, and other holdings.
Their overriding concern: treating all three children fairly. But fair, as they would learn, does not mean equal.
The Challenge
Beyond the ownership question, there were leadership readiness concerns. Alex had tenure but hadn’t been tested in a senior leadership capacity. Barb brought outside experience but was still re-establishing herself internally. Non-family key employees also needed to see a credible path forward.
Our Approach
Leadership Assessment and Development. Alex and Barb completed leadership assessments alongside non-family key employees. This gave the family objective data about readiness, gaps, and development priorities. Individual coaching helped each candidate grow into the competencies the company would need.
Strategic Vision. The family worked together — all three children included — to articulate a shared vision for the company’s future. This gave Alex and Barb a framework to lead from, and gave Charlie confidence that the business would be managed in a way that protected the family’s legacy.
Ownership and Transition Structure. Working alongside the family’s legal and tax advisors, we helped design a transition that was fair without being equal. The business was transferred to Alex and Barb at the lowest defensible value, minimizing tax impact. Charlie was included through non-business assets, ensuring equitable total value without complicating governance.
The Outcome
Does This Sound Familiar?
Every engagement starts with a conversation. Tell us what you’re facing.
Start a Conversation →